Spoiler Alert! In
this blog entry, I discuss the movie “Magic Mike”, the film about the lives of
a group of strippers based on actor Channing Tatum’s real life
experiences. I’m going to be discussing
the end of the film, so if you haven’t seen it and want to, read this blog
entry after – and let me know if you agree with my analysis.
For my birthday in July, my sister offered to take me to a
movie, and we mutually, enthusiastically agreed upon “Magic Mike”, the movie
based on actor/stud Channing Tatum’s real life experiences as a stripper. I made my sister buy the tickets
herself. Believe it or not, I was afraid
that the pimply-faced teen working the ticket counter would laugh at a late
thirty-something man coming to ogle Channing Tatum in his stripper movie.
I liked it – up until the ending, that is. You see, we’re shown that being a straight
stripper is a wild ride. Money in spades
and adoring audiences of women. But in
the mix are some shady characters and the temptation of drugs. And for our hero Channing Tatum, the wild
ride comes to an end when he realizes that the stripper life is a dead-end
street. He makes the “right” choice to leave stripping and take up with a
“good” girl (read: boring, plain-jane, and button-down). She is the film’s moral compass, and the film
ends up being a morality tale. Like many
a Hollywood film, it at first glorifies the fast-life, then swoops down to make
us numb-nuts in the audience remember that we will pay for the error of our
ways unless we do the “right” (read: Judeo-Christian) thing.
And it worked on me – for a while. I went home and thought, Why can’t I meet a
gorgeous Channing Tatum look-alike stripper who leaves it all to be with me, so
that we can live happily ever after in a house with a white-picket fence? Then I got to thinking about the real
Channing Tatum. Is he, in life, the
morally reborn guy that he becomes in the movie? By the end of the movie, Channing’s character
feels de-sexed. Does Channing really
have a secret kink? Do he and his wife swing?
To avoid a complete moralization, Matthew McConaughey’s
character is given a moment to shine wherein his character shows self-pride by
giving a bombastic performance. But
McConaughey’s character is kept one dimensional throughout the movie, thus making
it hard for the audience to relate to this odd duck who seems actually proud of
his life choices.
Tell me: what’s more
naive? To believe in the fairy tale that
the movie leaves you with as Channing goes with the good girl and leaves all
that stripping behind? Or that you can
be a stripper, and feel fulfilled and good about yourself. Just recently, I read in the local gay
magazine that a stripper in my city died recently. The story skirted around the manner in which
he had died, but made note that the bar where he worked and his family wished
people to make donations in his name to a suicide hotline. You don’t have to work in the adult industry
to be pushed to suicide, but I can’t help but wonder if we as a society push
the adult-industry workers to it when we devalue, degrade, and denigrate them.
How about this novel idea?
Could it be that, as my sister once told me, that no matter which choice
you make, there will be consequences.
Will Channing’s character and his “good” girl always lie in a bed of
roses, or will there be times when his character secretly misses the excitement
of performing? Is it possible that
stripping is indeed fraught with pitfalls, but that they can be avoided? Because we collectively tell people in adult
entertainment that it’s a slippery slope, does it become a self-fulfilling
prophecy? Much like when you treat
someone like they’re stupid, they will act stupid?
Life is never black
and white, and the pat, moralistic tone from “Magic Mike” offers no insights
into life, which is a messy, contradictory experience. It still appears that the last thing we want
to do is to tell someone that they can be sexually expressive and healthy at
the same time. The only condoned type of
sexual expression gets put in a very small narrow box. I beg to differ.